Login / Register
Sharpen Your Knowledge with PECB (ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager) Certification Sample Questions
CertsTime has provided you with a sample question set to elevate your knowledge about the PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27035 Lead Incident Manager exam. With these updated sample questions, you can become quite familiar with the difficulty level and format of the real ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager certification test. Try our sample PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27035 Lead Incident Manager certification practice exam to get a feel for the real exam environment. Our sample practice exam gives you a sense of reality and an idea of the questions on the actual PECB ISO/IEC 27035 Information Security Incident Management certification exam.
Our sample questions are similar to the Real PECB ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager exam questions. The premium PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27035 Lead Incident Manager certification practice exam gives you a golden opportunity to evaluate and strengthen your preparation with real-time scenario-based questions. Plus, by practicing real-time scenario-based questions, you will run into a variety of challenges that will push you to enhance your knowledge and skills.
PECB ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager Sample Questions:
What determines the frequency of reviewing an organization's information security incident management strategy?
Scenario 2: NoSpace, a forward-thinking e-commerce store based in London, is renowned for its diverse products and advanced technology. To enhance its information security, NoSpace implemented an ISMS according to ISO/IEC 27001 to better protect customer data and ensure business continuity. Additionally, the company adopted ISO/IEC 27035-1 and ISO/IEC 27035-2 guidelines. Mark, the incident manager at NoSpace, strategically led the entire implementation. He played a crucial role in aligning the company's ISMS with the requirements specified in ISO/IEC 27001, using ISO/IEC 27035-1 guidelines as the foundation.
During a routine internal audit, a minor anomaly was detected in the data traffic that could potentially indicate a security threat. Mark was immediately notified to assess the situation. Then, Mark and his team immediately escalated the incident to crisis management to handle the potential threat without further assessment. The decision was made to ensure a swift response.
After resolving the situation, Mark decided to update the incident management process. During the initial phase of incident management, Mark recognized the necessity of updating NoSpace's information security policies. This included revising policies related to risk management at the organizational level as well as for specific systems, services, or networks. The second phase of the updated incident management process included the assessment of the information associated with occurrences of information security events and the importance of classifying events and vulnerabilities as information security incidents. During this phase, he also introduced a ''count down'' process to expedite the evaluation and classification of occurrences, determining whether they should be recognized as information security incidents.
Mark developed a new incident management policy to enhance the organization's resilience and adaptability in handling information security incidents. Starting with a strategic review session with key stakeholders, the team prioritized critical focus areas over less impactful threats, choosing not to include all potential threats in the policy document. This decision was made to keep the policy streamlined and actionable, focusing on the most significant risks identified through a risk assessment. The policy was shaped by integrating feedback from various department heads to ensure it was realistic and enforceable. Training and awareness initiatives were tailored to focus only on critical response roles, optimizing resource allocation and focusing on essential capabilities
Scenario 2 (continued from above)
According to scenario 2, in which phase did Mark introduce a ''count down'' process?
Why is it important to identify all impacted hosts during the eradication phase?
Scenario 8: Moneda Vivo, headquartered in Kuala Lumpur. Malaysia, is a distinguished name in the banking sector. It is renowned for its innovative approach to digital banking and unwavering commitment to information security. Moneda Vivo stands out by offering various banking services designed to meet the needs of its clients. Central to its operations is an information security incident management process that adheres to the recommendations of ISO/IEC 27035-1 and 27035-2.
Recently. Moneda Vivo experienced a phishing attack aimed at its employees Despite the bank's swift identification and containment of the attack, the incident led to temporary service outages and data access issues, underscoring the need for improved resilience The response team compiled a detailed review of the attack, offering valuable insights into the techniques and entry points used and identifying areas for enhancing their preparedness.
Shortly after the attack, the bank strengthened its defense by implementing a continuous review process to ensure its incident management procedures and systems remain effective and appropriate While monitoring the incident management process, a trend became apparent. The mean time between similar incidents decreased after a few occurrences; however, Moneda Vivo strategically ignored the trend and continued with regular operations This decision was rooted in a deep confidence in its existing security measures and incident management protocols, which had proven effective in quick detection and resolution of issues
Moneda Vivo's commitment to transparency and continual improvement is exemplified by its utilization of a comprehensive dashboard. This tool provides real time insights into the progress of its information security incident management, helping control operational activities and ensure that processes stay within the targets of productivity, quality, and efficiency. However, securing its digital banking platform proved challenging. Following a recent upgrade, which included a user interface change to its digital banking platform and a software update, Moneda Vivo recognized the need to immediately review its incident management process for accuracy and completeness. The top management postponed the review due to financial and time constraints.
Based on scenario 8, Moneda Vivo has recently upgraded its digital banking platform. In line with the continual improvement process, Moneda Vivo has decided to review the information security incident management process for accuracy immediately after the software update. Is this recommended?
According to ISO/IEC 27035-2, how should an organization plan the development of the incident response team capabilities?
Note: If there is any error in our PECB ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager certification exam sample questions, please update us via email at support@certstime.com.
Try Before You Buy!